We need your consent to display map services
We use Google Maps as third-party software in order to be able to present our locations to you here.
By clicking on "Accept" you agree to the data processing by Google.
Feel free to write us!
We are on site for you. Feel free to contact our consultants.
We use Google Maps as third-party software in order to be able to present our locations to you here.
By clicking on "Accept" you agree to the data processing by Google.
Learn more about us
Article by Dr. Rebekka Haller
The recent hurricanes “Milton” and “Helene” have brought the importance of catastrophe bonds into the public eye. At the end of September, Hurricane Helene devastated large parts of the south-east of the USA and claimed 230 lives, making it the deadliest storm to hit the US mainland since Hurricane Katrina in 2005. It was followed just a few days later by Hurricane Milton, which temporarily developed from a tropical storm into a category five hurricane.
Even though “Milton” ultimately caused less damage than feared, the insurance industry could be faced with losses of up to 100 billion dollars. “Milton” could thus become one of the most expensive hurri-canes to date. Hurricane Katrina, which devastated the USA, particularly New Orleans, in 2005, remains at the top of this inglorious ranking. Insured losses at the time amounted to 99.8 billion dollars, while total economic losses reached as much as 201 billion dollars.
Such events highlight the need to insure against losses from natural disasters. Catastrophe bonds are a financial instrument that insurance companies use to pass on this risk to the capital market. But can and should investors also invest in cat bonds?